Are Leaders Born Or Made?
For centuries people have debated whether leaders are born or made. Several decades ago researchers started trying to answer the question. The debate goes on, even though we know the answer.
It turns out to be a little of both. Leaders are sort of born and they’re always made. Knowing the details will help you develop effective leaders for your company.
Leaders are Sort of Born
It seems like there’s only one thing that a person needs to actually be born with in order to be a leader later in life. That’s intelligence. A leader needs to be smart enough.
Effective leaders aren’t necessarily the smartest people in the room or the company or even on the team. But they have to be smart enough to do the job they’re assigned.
What’s more important is what kind of person the potential leader is when he or she becomes an adult. The person who emerges from adolescence into young adulthood has the psychological and character traits they’ll demonstrate for the rest of their life. Some of those matter for leadership.
By the time a person becomes an adult we can tell if they can help other people achieve results. That, after all, is what we expect leaders to do. We expect them to achieve success through a group. We expect them to help their subordinates grow and develop.
By the time a person becomes an adult, we can tell if they want to achieve objectives or if they just want to go along and take it easy. We expect leaders to be responsible for achieving results. You can have a marvelous life without a results focus, but if you’re going to lead successfully you have to have the drive and willingness to be measured by the results of your leadership.
By the time a person becomes an adult, we can tell if they are willing to make decisions or not. Lots of people wake up every day and let the world happen to them. But leaders must be able and willing to make decisions that affect themselves and others.
By the time a person becomes an adult we can tell if they have the basic qualities that we expect leaders to have. We can determine if they’re smart enough to do the job. We can tell if they are willing to help others to achieve results as a group. And we can tell if they will make decisions.
Those things are essential. People who have them can learn the multiple skills it takes for them to become effective leaders.
No matter how they measure up on the key essentials, no one emerges from the womb or from adolescence with all the skills in place to be an effective leader. Everybody has to learn the job. That’s why leaders are always made.
Leaders are Always Made
Leadership can be learned by anyone with the basics. But an awful lot of leadership cannot be taught.
That’s because leadership is an apprentice trade. Leaders learn about 80 percent of their craft on the job.
They learn from watching other leaders and emulating their behavior. They choose role models and seek out mentors. They ask other leaders about how to handle situations.
Leaders improve by getting feedback and using it. The best leaders seek feedback from their boss, their peers and their subordinates. Then they modify their behavior so that they get better results.
Leaders learn by trying things out and then critiquing their performance. The only failure they recognize is the failure to learn from experience.
In their book, Geeks and Geezers, Warren Bennis and Robert Thomas identify the special power of what they call “crucibles.” These are trials which teach hard lessons that leaders use as the basis of their strength in later crises. Many of these events can be called “failures,” but leaders turn the bad situation to good by learning from it.
Effective leaders take control of their own development. They seek out training opportunities that will make a difference that will make a difference in their performance.
Effective leaders look for training programs that will help them develop specific skills that they can use on the job. Then, they when they return to work, they devote specific, deliberate effort to mastering in real life what they learned in the classroom.
Marshall Goldsmith and Howard Morgan studied the progress of 88,000 managers who had been to leadership development training. The people who returned from the training, talked about it, and did deliberate work to apply their learning were judged as becoming more effective leaders. The ones who didn’t showed no improvement.
If you’re responsible for leadership development for your company, you should structure your support for your leaders to recognize that most leadership learning happens on the job. Help people develop leadership development plans. Help them select specific skills training and then work on transferring skills from the training to the job. Help them find role models, mentors and peers to discuss leadership issues.
Help your leaders get feedback from their boss, peers and subordinates. Work to create the culture of candor that will make that feedback helpful and effective.
Don’t stop there. Make sure that you evaluate your leaders on their leadership work. Reward them and hold them accountable for accomplishing the mission through the group. And hold them accountable for caring for their people and helping them grow and develop.
A Leader’s Growth is Never Done
Leadership learning is a lifetime activity. You’re never done because there’s always more to learn. There are always skills you need to improve.
Effective leaders seek out development opportunities that will help them learn new skills. Those might be project assignments or job changes. What they have in common is that the leader develops knowledge and skills that can be used elsewhere.
Effective leaders also seek out opportunities that will increase their visibility. The fact is that great performance alone will not propel you to the top in your career. You also have to be visible to people who make decisions about promotions and assignments.
If you’re responsible for developing leaders in your company, set up programs to give your leaders both kinds of development opportunities over the course of their careers.
There’s no magic formula for developing quality leaders in your company. But if you select potential leaders with the essential traits, then support them with training, feedback, on-the-job learning and development experiences and hold them accountable for results, you’ll have the leaders you need to shape your company’s future.
November 30th, 2008 at 11:48 pm
Who said Leaders are born not made?
I know there's some US Football coach who said leaders are made not born, that's not my question.
Someone suggested it was Marx. But, who knows?
Need to know for my dissertation on Leadership Styles and Motivation. But can't find a reference to it anywhere.
December 1st, 2008 at 4:50 am
colin powell
http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2005/november30/powell-113005.html
References :
December 1st, 2008 at 4:52 am
Vince Lombardi:
Leaders aren't born they are made. And they are made just like anything else, through hard work. And that's the price we'll have to pay to achieve that goal, or any goal.
Warren G. Bennis:
The most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born — that there is a genetic factor to leadership. This myth asserts that people simply either have certain charismatic qualities or not. That's nonsense; in fact, the opposite is true. Leaders are made rather than born.
References :
http://www.wisdomquotes.com/cat_leadership.html
December 1st, 2008 at 4:54 am
Not sure, but Shakespeare once said:
"Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some
have greatness thrust upon them."
References :
December 1st, 2008 at 4:56 am
Audrey Helfman
References :
December 1st, 2008 at 4:58 am
Leaders are created by social circumstances dont you think '' come the time come the man'', so youn might get a kennedy or a Hitler or a stalin or a churchill ,
I dont think that the assumption the leaders are are not born ,but are crated by social forces is an accurate one
References :
January 2nd, 2009 at 6:23 pm
[...] Are Leaders Born Or Made? Marshall Goldsmith and Howard Morgan studied the progress of 88000 managers who had been to leadership development training. The people who returned from the training, talked about it, and did deliberate work to apply their learning … [...]
January 2nd, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Someone said…don’t remember who…”Leadership can be learned but not taught” Perhaps it is just focus and willingness that makes the difference.
January 2nd, 2009 at 9:02 pm
I think everyone has leadership within them - so they are born with it. The area in which a person displays this leadership is the key point. Some people may never come across their ‘area of leadership’ so they may never be perceived as a leader.
But if a person finds this area, their expertise will shine.
Think of the reverse case - take a great leader in business and now put that same leader in a completely different area (one where they have no expertise). If there is another person with leadership abilities (even a small amount), they will be the leader in this situation.
January 2nd, 2009 at 9:42 pm
BORN:
Such statements as “He is born to be a leader” or “She is a natural leader” are commonly expressed by people who take the trait perspective toward leadership (p1). It was one of the first systematic attempts to study leadership. It is often called the “great man” theory because it focused on identifying the innate qualities and characteristics possessed by such leaders as Gandhi, Lincoln, and Napoleon (p15).
Northouse, Peter, (2004). Leadership Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.
MADE:
“If you have the necessary desire, you can develop into an increasingly effective leader.”
“Good leaders develop through a never-ending process of self-study, education, training, and experience.”
US. Army (1983). Military Leadership. FM 22-100, (p1). Ft. Monroe, VA: TRADOC.
As process, leadership can be observed in leader behaviors, and is something that can be learned.
Jago, A.G. (1982). Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management Science, 28(3), 315-336.
January 3rd, 2009 at 10:04 am
As a lifelong student of leadership, I’ve come to the conclusion that leaders have an inate drive to be in front of the group. Sometimes it has to be brought out of their character. This drive initally brings comfort and confident to try to lead. If successful, the drive continues. If failure occurs, those who have the additional capacity to try again, will eventually get it right and find their leadership niche.
In actually, most people don’t want to lead therefore it is quite easy to move into a leadership position if the desire is strong enough and one can demonstrate the capacity to produce followers. Isn’t that how “politicians” are created??
January 4th, 2009 at 4:28 am
I would compare a good leader to a polished diamond. Just like you cannot polish any stone to sparkle like a diamond you cannot take any individual and groom them to be a leader, the potential needs to be there.